Which of the following is NOT a reason for conducting post-incident reviews?

Conducting post-incident reviews serves a critical purpose in learning and improving the approach to defensive tactics and law enforcement interactions. The primary goals of these reviews include analyzing what occurred during an incident to extract valuable lessons, assessing officer performance to identify strengths and areas for improvement, and determining how to avoid similar incidents in the future through better strategies.

Justifying the use of force does not align with the core intent of a post-incident review. These reviews focus on growth, accountability, and enhancing future responses rather than serving as a means to defend or rationalize an officer's decisions during an incident. Justification of force is typically more related to legal defense and may involve external reviews or inquiries rather than the constructive criticism and learning environment that post-incident reviews aim to foster.